但是現在發現並不是，而是動員的工具，每一個網站只要連到五個別的動員網站，一瞬間動員的群組就形成了，這個是Swift trust，很快彼此信任，然後就集結起來、展示力量，不管在全球資訊網的任何一個角落就可以看到「藍絲帶」掛在那邊。
, as of yesterday, it’s now legal to import. So, we do trust our citizens to also understand
on provenance technologies, works on pervasive FIDO rollout, and many other things, zero trust architecture
two broad classes. One is the trusted institutions and numbers. One is the friends and families who have met, and everybody else is a bot.
classified information, but I do trust Howard 簡 and taking care of these matters.
you think that format of that governance looks like? Is it that we end up with some trusted
Yeah, I would recommend to trust the citizens more and to listen at scale. Those are my two main
另外，剛剛講到 zero trust，我們在推的「更信任」，從硬體的信任、晶片的信任、晶片資安、系統化的資安，各國都關切資安的風險，很多資安的東西不是公司自己做了就算，必須要有一些國際上的合規，如何達到供應鏈當中，這也是公會切入的點，以上。
我們有一些分工，就是我們自己試出來的做法，像 Zero trust
we need to look at the web3 world where there is like, you know, zero trust all around
can then shape it to say, you know, this is like a general pollution on the fabric of trust, and we
現在做這幾件事，怎麼樣讓大家覺得這件事對他沒有幫助，所以很願意真實加入這個事情，因為變成有這個trust，才會有很好的資料，大家才會開始做其他
this explanation, again, the public trust of the system increased especially because people do see
. And to me that means trusting the people, because you’re yielding your most important power, which is agenda setting power to the people.
this is the collective will of the stakeholders, when we implement that, it also increase trust.
GlobalPlatform 也跟我們簽署合作備忘錄，確保晶片安全標準跟國際接軌，不管是物聯網或者是晶片的供應鏈，在國際上現在大家看到 M.I.T.（Made in Taiwan），這個「T」也是「Trust」，也就是能夠信任這樣的做法。
現在做這幾件事，怎麼樣讓大家覺得這件事對他沒有幫助，所以很願意真實加入這個事情，因為變成有這個trust，才會有很好的資料，大家才會開始做其他的事，所以這個也是我們今天想要來找他的，我覺得這個
the epistemic expectation of online interaction. And so this pollution to fabricate trust is wide ranging
of a shared cognitive, shared reality, fabric of trust that these emerging technologies employed by authoritarians.
，這是剛剛資安團隊所談的部分。部長有跟討論過，「T」不只是臺灣，也是「Trust」的部分所以這個是我們很重要的目標，稍微補充。
