control, but on privacy, part of the zero trust, new architecture is so that you can authenticate
trust fingerprinting digital signature or some kind. And this is a large threat vector. It means social
, zero-trust, FidO, and so on; we try it ourselves within our ministries and the two departments
to amplify their particular solution. It could be zero trust, it could be zero knowledge, proofs
the same FIDO compliant ways to implement zero trust and our architecture as to make sure that it remains
the trusted number 111, so they know it comes from the government. And out of the people who filled
and so on. What used to take a lot of efforts in just building the basic rapport, right, basic trust
that I got, if I can trust it, or there is a lot of problems.
that. And really, it’s very toxic for the online trust, because not only are those celebrities unhappy about
I wanted to say first of all, Meaningful transparency can be helpful in building trust in AI
, you cannot really trust anything on content alone. You have to check digital signatures. You have
and critical infrastructure that has national personal data to switch that entirely into zero trust
are more nimble. We can switch to passwordlessness quicker. We can implement zero trust quicker. We can do
-trust defense systems, as well as asking people to help keeping us afloat, right, by making sure
. And there are even technologies like designated verifier, meaning that if both of us trust an intermediator
I don’t know if that was the best place to out, but also because there was no trust on either
雖然我們自己並沒有下去作檢測，但是我們generally trust，因為各國政府都已經用了，他們的contribution會回到這裡來，所以discourse的accessibility
剛剛講到的 Born global 確實也必須靠著大家把好的資安習慣導入，像 Zero trust 的導入。像剛剛講的數據公益，也是靠當初剛有公鏈技術時，大家發現個資上鏈就完蛋了，必須要用零知
be done through a trusted intermediary, which maintains contextual integrity and shares in a zero
sectors are trusted partners, and they are, in a sense, taking over with some public oversight
