I think making social innovation dependent on industrial innovation, in the narrative, I think creates a kind of perversion of categories. If we say social innovation is by itself useful, that distributed ledger, by itself, creates trust making new governance possible without having any GDP contributions. I think that is a much more balanced view.
If we lose that trust , then Twitter doesn’t really exist very well in the world. It’s also a real value point for us and to us a company. A lot of people come to Twitter to work for us because one, most of its surfaces are so public, and it is so open.
They interviewed a professor from NTU department of psychology, as well as eye doctors. Everybody builds context based on their publication. It’s not a blind faith or blind trust into the capability of them as journalists, but rather the source and the public transcript of their conversation with the source that understand the legitimacy.
DLT plays a crucial role, because people have to trust that even with the huge number of GPUs that the NCHC has, it cannot disrupt the validity of the public chain. I think that is crucial. One of the winning teams actually, in this competition, I think makes a very good use of AirBox data.
Right. Academia Sinica is a very special design because it doesn’t report to the cabinet. It belongs directly to the president’s office. In a sense, it is above all the different values represented by different ministries and can generally be trusted as a Lagrange point between the social sector and the public sector.
Also makes good business sense. The environmental agencies doesn’t have to sign on a state-to-state level. It could be just Taiwan Water Corporation or the civic tech with that local accelerator people. When partnership like that happens, it’s almost magical because both sides trust each other with each other’s data.
They get free money from the Ministry of Education if they can do capstone curriculum that runs for two-plus, three years with the community to enhance the community’s meaning-making process. That’s, I think, very important toward solving the issue that you just talked about, which is disintegrating trust on local communities.
To create something that is of core value to all the ministries, how to rebuild trust in the society, this is why we unite together. We may have people who care about culture more. We may have people who care about national communication. For example, the Minister of Interior maybe care about the social order.
I agree with you. I think the trust needs to be established. there needs to be a few more testimonials, maybe even a working model that you can tell that story. I know you’re in beta right now, so it’s just trying to make sure it works before we flood it with traffic.
There’s quite a few ways, I think, we can integrate the virtual domain. The knowledge itself, and technologies and methodologies, they are inherently cross-border. As long as everybody keeps to their cybersecurity, as long as there’s no anonymous attackers bringing the Internet down, Internet, by itself, is a machine run from trust .
Then, at the time the Italian’s government ran an advertisement as to whom I had already read. They said, "Economic boosting applying is too complicated. Ordinary citizens doesn’t have a chance to understand it, such as, ’Follow whatever the government says and trust the government, pliantly.’’ It’s not a very popular advertisement.
So 10 years of engagement through enragement morphed our social feeds into adrenaline factories. It rewarded extremes. It muted the nuance. And the environment of fractured trust is exactly what authoritarians around the world exploit. And now adding generative AI to the mix, and we’re spinning ever faster with slop: content with zero relational nutrition.
This transforms alignment from blind trust in a global model spec to verifiable stewardship held by each community. The ability to provide precise citations to the community spec is very powerful. We want to make this the norm for participating social media platforms, including Discord, Bluesky, Roblox, and others. This is a very interesting new development.
One community may have a policy around creation care, while another may have a norm around climate justice. The model itself is not opinionated. It acts as a safeguard for other AI systems or chatbots, gauging its reasoning process against the output of those systems — or humans, if used as a traditional trust and safety engine.
So, I think it makes sense instead of just doing the gene therapy prediction, the 23andMe case, which is personal, also make a case to the universal healthcare use case because it’s very aggregated already. And people already derive a lot of value by this being aggregated. But people trust the National Health Insurance people.
Yeah. They can never trust that you’re actually talking, because you’re always able to simulate, oh yeah, I voted the way you wanted, but you can never really believe that. So, we think that this is something that can, if you want to scale quadratic voting, that this tool is going to be important.
And then, the behavior part may have some clues. For example, Twitter recently basically says that if you pay up and then use the financial institutions to do KYC, then this behavior is going to be more trustworthy than people who are not going to pay to get a blue tick. So that’s maybe possible.
If we make sure that we work with their staff in a very close knit manner, and there’s a lot of mutual trust , then we only do top down enablements to the existing top down authorities when the situation calls for it and don’t do that if the situation don’t call for it.
Then we said everybody can learn from Ukraine, and then digital resilience for all become our slogan and free in the future. To the end, many people are now looking at these experiences like beer and so on, and rethink about the original assumptions when it comes to this security or the trustworthiness and so on.
We rely on, for example, every 2:00 PM, the CECC press conference works like an “ask me anything” in front of journalists. Also we trust our citizens, in that if you just call 1922, the toll-free number, someone with a lot of empathy, a real person not a voice recorder, will listen to you.
