their trust, and they earn their trust by responding to each and every question that you just refer to in the daily press conference.
How should we trust what they are saying now? You didn’t have that problem because even before
, right? Norms, in essence, are stronger. To spell out the norms requires the government to trust
One side of the coin is government trusting citizens. The other side is citizens trusting
For example, whether it is possible to explain why we trust strangers very quickly online
That leads to what we call "swift trust," meaning a quick trusting of strangers, just because
. If the government, through open government, can trust the people radically, people will eventually trust back
A lot of the discussion and the way it’s measured, globally, is citizen’s trust in government
translating the term "accountability." I think accountability earns trust. Nobody starts trusting
actually not. After each process such as this, people’s trust with each other, as well, as the public service trust to the people, increases.
trust. At least try and trust enough to run the presidential debates and policy presentations, which is actually going on right now.
makes people distrust the government more. What’s important here is the government need to trust
It’s designed in this way, so that you don’t have to trust any trusted
interested in a hashtag. They very quickly trust each other. It’s called swift trust.
You must have a trust in the government even before the pandemic. I’m talking from Hungary
If sufficient amount of people – instead of blindly trusting the government – build up civic
The NHI may trust those researchers, but it’s not transitive and it’s not transferable. I mean
is that it is easier to tear down, say, trust than it is to build it up, although your work is exactly to find ways of rebuilding trust.
This is how trust can grow between the public servants and the public in general because every
How to measure trust through the measurement of the inner flow metric of the four pillars
