謝謝。剛剛這樣聽得滿清楚，還是回到新的技術，大家如何 trust 的問題，不管您剛剛提到因為太平洋的兩岸關係，所以信任的盈餘，現在看起來在我們這裡，所以是設立標準的時候。
And so that helps to build trust. So I think so, two points here. One, compared to the previous
on immutable common knowledge, which is really the foundation, I believe, for people to still trust
, you know, the fabric of trust between countries being affected by deepfakes like the CFCs, Freons
Trust Architecture, we cannot do it alone. We must work with the NIST and CMMCs of the world to make
, trusted access to the PaLM models as well. But language access will take some time.
academia, more in this, and also, I guess, more governance processes in terms of trust in their hopes, so
community, which is the zero or negative trust space. And they have now taken a norm that all
. And so by adopting the same zero trust architecture, we can then contribute back from our
government. No trust, no legitimacy, no credibility, because nobody could get fishing licenses that summer
and so on. What used to take a lot of efforts in just building the basic rapport, right, basic trust
that I got, if I can trust it, or there is a lot of problems.
that. And really, it’s very toxic for the online trust, because not only are those celebrities unhappy about
I wanted to say first of all, Meaningful transparency can be helpful in building trust in AI
control, but on privacy, part of the zero trust, new architecture is so that you can authenticate
trust fingerprinting digital signature or some kind. And this is a large threat vector. It means social
, zero-trust, FidO, and so on; we try it ourselves within our ministries and the two departments
to amplify their particular solution. It could be zero trust, it could be zero knowledge, proofs
the same FIDO compliant ways to implement zero trust and our architecture as to make sure that it remains
the trusted number 111, so they know it comes from the government. And out of the people who filled
