, free of copyrights to the public to reboot trust and contextualization, first thing.
Add on top of that the fact that for a long time now, trust in government even before
, without explaining the bias, then you cannot trust that assistant. Anything you can trust a human
to trust the citizens, because to give no trust is to get no trust.
These are fond memories. That empowered me, so that when my interest in studying swift trust
That’s amazing. What I love about it as well is this kind of deep assumption of trust
In Taiwan we say meeting face to face builds 30 percent of trust
Yeah. To give no trust is to get no trust. It’s very simple. We also
Yeah. To give no trust is to get no trust. It’s very simple. We also thank the people who do
Yeah, trust. And we also don’t want people to have to trust us because of who we are. We want
to have this mutual trust, the fabric of trust between government, the civil society
My aim mostly is just to find out why people would trust other so
You trust the pharmacists more, because you know that they’re tapping
Trust your own citizens. That’s my number one advice. To give no trust is to get no trust
Rather, they’re interested in researching about swift trust. About how people come to trust each
Zero Trust. But now everybody knows Zero Trust. You see the MPs regularly post about Zero Trust
My particular area of expertise is, in 17.18, making sure everybody can trust each other
circumstances. Maybe there was more trust than the government. Tzu Chi in particular has a lot of track
was explaining to the head of my school why my research program, as I call it, of understanding swift trust
or zero trust capabilities. After all, Google pioneered zero trust when it’s not called zero trust
