As journalists, you understand that journalism is a fundamental part of this common understanding. But press freedom in China before 2015 was quite different from the freedom journalists have now. So I don’t agree that high surveillance, maintaining stability, and creating a “clean and harmonious” internet is necessarily the best way to achieve safety. Taiwan’s ability to respond to the pandemic in 2020 or 2021 was not worse than China’s—by most statistical measures, it was better. Yet we didn’t lock down any cities or information. Our journalists could ask questions and receive answers every day at 2 PM. In this situation, we believe this distributed, government-transparent-to-people approach is actually safer. The pandemic is a good example—the clearer people were about the actual situation, whether regarding mask distribution or other aspects, the better.