are adopting, the so-called zero trust architecture, meaning that instead of relying just
concerning themselves and we should trust children to join also in public participation before
Exactly, exactly. Yeah, so, for example, the zero-trust FidO implementation, of course
integration, just sabotage the whole zero trust architecture idea because the root, the active directory was hacked.
of those supply chain anyway. The focus should be on zero trust, meaning that the no lateral movement
-identified data, anonymous data, etc., then that actually decimates the trust of the society.
Because the government trusted the citizen enough to not just have a free speech platform
Let me ask you about AI. So, AI is clearly helpful in this project. Would you ever trust an AI
sector really can go a long way in building trust, right?
I think, it’s also the whole issue around trust of the data, both your payment credentials
on how to actually make an impact, and activists learn from us on how to trust strangers.
the way I think and the way I want to solve problems. I see transparency as a foundation for trust.
of curriculum, I think the society gradually gives trust to people who are doing AI research to keep
them, "Hey, you should trust IOTA." It’s your choice.
of the tension, and the trust in government becomes declining, because whatever government do you can’t
This is a three-part thing. The first one is the stakeholders building trust deciding on exactly
", we mean specifically, 17, 18, which is the availability of reliable data that people from across sectors, across jurisdictions, can trust the data.
The many people who are environmentalists here don’t necessarily trust the government
, but it is people’s right to distrust the government, and it’s the government’s duty to find ways to trust
things you don’t approach. That gained our trust with the social activists who share the same value
