to undermine trust in institutional media or in democracy itself. Information that cause public harm
if people here don’t trust democracy nor the media.
If, on the other hand, the government doesn’t trust the people, and expect people to blindly put
with people, do you see this as a way that you can personally build trust with your constituency?
a thriving journalism that people can trust. I think it’s very important because then they would
It increases trust. People, like in climate research or in air quality, if their data
it easy for people to trust each other. That’s especially true because the computation center is in the National Center for High-Speed Computation, the NCHC.
DLT plays a crucial role, because people have to trust that even with the huge number of GPUs
to check that, and so on. It’s a cheap way to get people to trust each other more. We have many uses for along that lane, but not as cryptocurrency.
say 見面三分情 — there’s a 30 percent of trust just by meeting alone.
on development deficit, and the third on trust deficit. Since the Social Innovation Hub touches and works
. In Taiwan, we say 見面三分情 -- there is 30 percent of trust which is by meeting face-to-face.
access by relying and indeed trusting more on the social sector, rather than concentrating power on the public or the private sectors.
to trust the people to understand the mission that they’re working toward is toward the common value as the people has.
for the government system increases trust because people can see that the public sector is really
, a different kind of…Sorry. The social media made a different kind of crowd that very quickly come to trust
is simple. It’s simple-structured work I think are prime candidates for this kind of trust first
with the Green Island, it’s a smaller island where the local people didn’t trust the local clinic that much
. In Taiwan, we say meeting face-to-face builds 30 percent of trust.
I think there’s a lot of trust just in public service that this way
