簡單講就是 trust our citizens，就是無論如何一定要信任公民。這就是最重要的價值。
The collective intelligence needs to be trusted and augmented. They explicitly cited our model
than seven years they can pay dividends in terms of the mutual trust and also resilience.
questions around health data sharing, trusted access to data, digital public infrastructures
of the implementers are on the g0v, G zero V, which is the community that powered the original Occupy. A lot of public trust, and on g0v, alike, too.
were then taken into the government. The government must begin first. We must trust citizens first.
our zero-trust cybersecurity wasn’t all the way there. We rely on an internal network to keep them safe.
The main reason why is that, we trust the citizens. The citizens come up with good ideas
trust. Because of the success of civil IoT and many other civil collaboratives, we finally instill
regained the trust of the judge, certainly, but also of the civil rights groups.
In zero trust architecture, there’s no intranet. There is no distinction between a firewall
In addition to that, adopting a Zero Trust Architecture means, that there’s very limited damage
This diversity is not always rosy. In 2014, the public trust to the administration was below 10
scenario in communities such as Ethereum, nobody trust anyone. [laughs] It’s very adversarial, everyone you meet is probably a scammer. [laughs]
The third thing that we are coming to this year is to adopt the zero trust network architecture
While I understand that there are many entrepreneurs working to resolve the free flow’s trust
and GDPR system, so that the data can still flow freely with trust.
I think erosion of trust is the main societal risk scenario I’m worried about. Currently
think something like 5% or so of the city’s budget to this participation mechanism, because they did not fully trust that it would produce useful outcomes.
And so then the trust in institutions grew gradually because of the reason being that we open
