This is important because it’s only with this kind of neutrality people could trust us
that misinformation affects trust on all the sectors of life, not just the public sector. Taiwan, as I said, is forced
will be taken into account the next year. This really builds radical trust among people. They know they get invitation just by complaining.
, of course people are going to trust this number that’s participated by the citizen, even if those two disagree, and even if this one is more precise.
of technology. It is attacking the fabric of trust so it’s a different thing, completely different thing. I
to have that bond of seeing you, trusting you, starting to see you in a new light, hearing what
efficient than laws, so we don’t have to obey laws anymore, and so on. It also corrodes people’s trust
on this website you have to trust the system operators anyway because it is cross sectoral.
The cross-sectoral trust in this kind of referee, I think, is a core of your method. We talked
want a quick fix of anything, this kind of open model slow process is not for that. It needs time. It needs space. It needs trust.
For our office, the core value is to increase the mutual trust between the public service
trust in a sustainable way vis a vis people who have a lot of resources in terms of money and other non
essentially increase the mutual trust between the government and the movement.
Then we have an area about digital trust and security, and we are very concerned how
Subscription based crowdfunding depends on a almost personal trust between the people
data on the other side, and they’re seen as a trusted point between the public sector and the social sector.
radical transparency, but radical trust between the various stakeholders in the society.
understood finally that people want to trust their local clinicians more.
nothing to really build that trust. I think that’s something that you need to figure out how to do
I heard that people won’t use technology they don’t understand, or they don’t trust. How do you