as a unified body that everyone seems to trust and represents everyone. I can just imagine in America
for this purpose, you has to develop that trusting relationship between a machine and a human. In order to do that, you have to have explainability.
think it is really a societal mobilization. It is hinging the idea of the government trusting the citizens.
and foremost this trust from the government to its citizens. We do not, for example, institute a very top down
doesn’t spread, because everybody can trust their camp’s YouTubers. That’s still a cost worth paying. Look at the US, what would happen without that?
shred that that paper after four weeks of no local outbreak, then people actually trust them enough
If people don’t, for example, trust their own Bluetooth device for the Exposure Notification
Sandstorm comes to my mind when I think about zero trust, basically, Sandstorm allows any public
and Mike Rogers talked about zero trust. I also take where we’re getting outlier signals, so maybe
time counting information from the Youtubers that they trust and therefore improve election integrity
from other occupy movements, then we can build trust and reach what I call good-enough consensus on the topic triggering the occupy.
that the government should trust their citizens more. That the young people, and not necessarily young people
, data coalitions and trusts, many other names, joint controllership, and things like that where
the last two, three years, the last decade, let’s say, the trust between government and society has eroded in the United States drastically.
If companies want to participate in governance, and also building of trusts through
Then, after that, of course, Taiwan’s political scene changed from people not trusting
It only works with the maximally trusted people, with real time open API. When Minister Chen
don’t want their values to be hijacked by technology, who want technology to adapt to the societal norms, to the communities that we already trust.
the interoperability of the one Internet, actually, the one Internet of Trust, of Names, and so on.
trust in the democratic process itself, not any particular party. It only is reasonable we take all hands on deck approach to counter it.
