It’s about whether people trusting paper more than computers to cast their votes, and with good
It was before Wikipedia was really popular, so we had to really radically trust our contributors
place, then that kind of trust model, there’s no need to distribute, give them profits, because the thing is there to provide the service.
is around trust, and the process revolution is around a much more iterative approach to making law?
. These things that they want to put to the agenda. Maybe they don’t trust the government enough
of trust, about using data as not just a playground, but actually a lubricant to inspire more
up the process of trust building. That’s one of the two.
...the idea of this as a trust-building thing is also of interesting tool. There’s so much
This is a mutual trust-building on both sides of the civil and government sides. I think
number, but the citizen also publish number, people who participated are going to trust their own numbers, no matter the position of the measurement.
It is by itself a show of mutual trust between the civil society organization and the government
There’s a lot of mutually trusted friends like a few New Zealands, like Richard Bartlett, who
of how we went about it is that trust is a two-way street.
It shows enormous trust to just share data about water pressure, about water quality this way
Just to reverse that trend, we need to work with the local people to reestablish trust
. That’s, I think, very important toward solving the issue that you just talked about, which is disintegrating trust on local communities.
of comfort in having one person that you can unconditionally trust. If that person gets things wrong
, and to facilitate a thriving journalism scene to let people regain trust on proper journalism.
that belongs to people and people can trust is important, and in a physical way, as a physical manifestation of the Minister of Culture’s belief in that.
if people already know each other they trust each other more to introduce more experimental digital
