-second that it depletes by two. [laughs] That is a symbol of public trust. Anything we make will have
our very holistic view of building trust.
lowers their trust, one example being facial recognition. It is not even an open secret.
That relationship of trust in my country is broken. I understand
hashtags, then you can have weak links and swift trust with so many other people as well. It’s a different norm.
with the civil society, learning about their stakeholder needs. In that way, they reduce their risk, saves their time, and increases trust.
something that is more transparent, increase more trust, saves time but increases political risk for the public servants.
line of code is not to be trusted even by the cybersecurity auditors. It takes precious time
that is mutually trusted by the social, private, and public sectors. Social Credit System and the Great
This has two benefit. One is that people trust each other more because
. This is structurally in our corner of the world that the most pressing challenge, the declining of trust on the democratic institutions.
To combat that declining of trust, you need to, first of all, get rid of the apathy
the pandemic because that will make trust much harder to build. Reusing existing blocks of infrastructure is the key to the Taiwan model.
that the telecom that they trust store the 28-days history of their whereabouts when checking in all the venues and public transportation.
Yes, and also to empower the social sector, namely the community pharmacists that are trusted
There’s a fear in people who don’t trust government or that artificial intelligence as use
You can build trust between people from different parts of the world, when they meet each other in person for longer time than just one conference.
the mutual trust when it comes to really large scale disaster be outbreaks are really aren’t large earthquakes.
on, they were not trying to advance one cause or the other, rather, they’re trying to destabilize people’s trust in the democratic process.
Instead of the two false dilemma, what we do is we trust the social