government because essentially government is only the fiduciary of your data and is beginning of a trust relationship.
, sometimes as effective, always generates more trust compared to the Singaporean model.
that we are seeing in lots of different places around the world at the moment, plummeting levels of trust in politicians, apathy.
Yeah, that was great. What about rebuilding trust in e-petitions
of trusting the authority to make all the, not just decisions, but also agenda setting and problem definition.
then of the NTU eForum, and they were kind of the most trusted reporters of what’s happening in the occupy
climate emergency, but if you don’t trust the scientists that produce the data, the data
Across high-definition bandwidth, it is maybe 20 percent of trust
they trust ???, very noteworthy news anchors. The cross-generational translation of the media literacy
, the basic idea of the open government is to rebuild the trust between government and people, or among more peoples.
Because for people receiving disinformation, they lose trust between
quite nearby – that makes the citizens transparent to the state and asks for essentially blind trust
. It’s also fun. When you have all the three pillars, mutual trust is much more possible.
don’t.” Unfortunately, we in America are a low-trust society.
The biggest challenge that we’ve got is the concept of building trust
that they could trust the citizens more. This is now the metric that most open governance…
If we reuse existing, already well-trusted components, and the innovation is in how to put them
I agree that the working together is important to cultivate the trust with the people
disrupt people’s faith and trust to each other and to the democratic process because that’s less
to things, but actually designing the zero-trust parameters using the latest zero knowledge, homomorphic encryption, and so on.
