, they create intelligent solutions and they create trust in a world where most of the people believe
Right. You won’t want much, in order for trust…My topic on Monday, I
and trusted sources, used by other credible institutions all over the world. A combination of multilateral
That would mean basically people who want to abuse the trust on other
could people trust each other so easily on the Internet as compared to face to face, and also distrust
When it comes to the trust that the other, not just Ukraine, but other similar-valued
security and resiliency coming into the forefront. You mentioned zero trust. Recently, you also
into a super stimulus that impersonates the people they trust more or are speaking an accent that they trust
transparency, meaning that we trust the people, even though the people doesn’t trust us yet. We make
I think just this posture of trusting is already making the public service much closer
We try to expand that more. The idea is that anything that increase the mutual trust is a gift
and a cross-functional agency as you are, trust is paramount. People need to trust that you’re not going away
all the work alone. They can learn to trust strangers, to crowdsource, to trust the social innovation ecosystem.
in an agile way, really, there’s no other choice than radically trust the citizens. We can move faster together in the speed of trust.
All of this needs people who don’t have implicit trust in each other to contribute data
and that of a government, namely that we both value trust and our people, the people who trust our services
to one group and make them trust you more, but you kind of exploit that trust and create negative
and read it and trust more the people they already trust and what they reported after reading
. Genuinely pretty good things to build trust and then abuse that trust.
Saying, “We have 2,000 AirBoxes. People trust us more than they trust
