is, what it has to offer. In some of these places, there is also very little trust in the national
in a democracy because it keeps the administrative power in check. It shows the government need to trust
That’s a huge science. I’m only worrying about trust. Trust is built
the why of policy-making and trusting the citizens without requiring citizen to trust back. We mean
In a sense, disinformation is just a symptom. It shows a lack of trust
a mutual trust with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Ministry of Health and Welfare
at Bitcoin and think about that, “Hey, this is a brand new way of people who previously couldn’t at all trust each other, to gain some trust.”
It does not actually entirely replace paper-based registration forms at venues. If you trust
devices, but we adopt what’s called a zero trust configuration. It’s a technical term, meaning
supporting us to build trust. One thing is we are a nonpartisan group. Another thing is trust; we do
, whereas perhaps it’s going back to zero trust model, it’s about don’t trust by default. Don’t assume what you’re hearing is correct.
That’s right. Trust is not like Bitcoin. It’s a relational concept. It only exists between many
good things. What are the biggest challenges? You mentioned trust, but how? Can you mention more details about how to build a trust?
If we are to increase trust at all, we have to first build trust between people here, in PDIS
of people who don’t trust something simply because a protocol; they trust because they had a part
We observed that people generally trust a international charity better than a domestic
It’s simple, in a sense, but I don’t think, originally I didn’t realize how much non-trust
It’s all about building trust and forging anti-corruption counterweights built on trust
You had mentioned earlier about the government trust in people and how this has facilitated
Which is why I put trust in the center and have those four pillars as the service of the trust
