trust us." That would be fascism. I think what we really need is to conditionlessly trust the public.
We are trying to make a culture based on trust. We have the mutual trust between sectors
, it’s on the rise. Minister Tang has said her approach, built on trust. Her premise is, from what I read
Yeah, it is a saying. It is a saying. Just meeting face-to-face builds 30 percent towards trust
In Mandarin, we say 見面三分情, you get 30 percent of trust just by meeting face-to-face. Through
higher and higher, it become much easier for the public to lose trust in the democracy. The more
Very much so, so it shows the public how much the government trusts
of building trust and facilitating trust. We’ve been working with at least 10 or so embassies
freedoms that it’s actually as effective and always generates more trust if you care about
As you said, there is something beautiful in that decay of public trust
massage. TaiwanCanHelp is not just soft power. It’s not just about credibility and trust, although
of trust. That really was true. Live streaming maybe builds 20 percent of trust. Then we
can shape the norm upon which the AI enters the society, then we can trust the AI as we trust some
for the government to say, “Oh, if we just publish the positive parts of our work, then the citizens will trust us
Previously, it’s difficult to give trust when all you have is a broadcasting radio microphone. I
Definitely. As I mentioned, to give no trust is to get no trust. By offering any inventory data
together with the society, instead of asking people to trust the government, we need to do the reverse, trust the citizens from the public service.
The patient did not trust, their family did not trust their local nurses and doctors to make
To gain people’s trust, we must always trust the citizens to understand our not using any
Rather than having a central think tank, or centralized trust of body or body of trust
