Well, because if you do not have good community spirit, civic care, and civic muscle, then it may be interesting to think of a machine in the sky that sees everything, solves everything, and so on. However, for most people who practice art, creativity, journalism, and so on, we understand that the meaning is in the relationships that we build through our work. It is not just the output of those works. To confuse the output of the work with the relational care is to make a categorical error between utilities and the ethics of care. And so if we have better moral imaginations, I think it would be quite obvious that we want assistive intelligence to strengthen the human-to-human relationship, and we would not sacrifice this human relationship and fall prey to synthetic intimacy, to isolation and polarization, just because we want to maximize some number, like GDP or maximizing the attention spent on touchscreens.