Which is why, as I mentioned, it needs to be a conversation with the teenagers. So instead of saying, you know, people under 18 or 16 simply cannot access this kind of software, we need to work with them, maybe set up systems and assemblies. Maybe listen to them at scale and say, “What should be the kind of healthy alternatives that we need to promote not just in schools, but also in families, that they prefer and their parents accept?” And then have those community-oriented technologies be the default and indeed widely available, maybe universally available. We can subsidize—as we did in Taiwan using the Universal Service Fund—the most rural places, the highest mountains, to have not just broadband access, but also the digital competency so that they can create and shape the norms together, instead of just saying “banning the bad stuff” while not promoting the good stuff.