After about an hour of discussion, we began weaving together people’s ideas using language models. The 45 rooms cohered around a core bundle of proposals, and experts answered questions about their feasibility in a plenary session. At the end of the day, people voted. We showed the three parties in our parliament that more than 85% of this “mini-public” agreed these were very good ideas. Of the 15% who did not think they were the best ideas, they could still live with them; they were not terribly unhappy.