But that was the Hutchins Commission insight, that if you can make the bridging narrative strong enough so people can get behind it, then it has a coalescing effect. So even people who were radicalized are attracted by the bridging narrative, so they become more into the middle again. So I think the debate we’re having now speaks to the lack of a really strong bridging narrative, and this is precisely what the kind of broad listening technology can help because it enables ordinary citizens to come up with surprising bridges that everybody can get behind. Whereas the journalists, because they usually only have institutional sources, it’s much more difficult for journalists to get a truly creative, innovative bridge. But citizens, once they compete to bridge-make, can make many surprising ideas. We have many good examples in Taiwan.