However, on the day of the intended launch, the LA wildfire happened. I was in California, so we did not launch the initiative then. On the other hand, the wildfire provided an even more urgent meta-context, which was not just how to build back better when it comes to policy, but also how to prevent future wildfires. So now, the platform launched with wildfire as the main topic and, of course, got something like 6,000 or more registrations and active participation. The uncommon ground was quickly discovered, and so on and so forth. It’s a success story so far, but I think that is because the first enabling condition (urgency) was met beyond the initial expectation. There’s no pro-wildfire party in California. So that is just to address your question about enabling conditions.