Which is why I say the government must trust the people, because
Just like in the pharmacies distributions network, we always trust
It really is. It really is because it stops the trusted messenger thing
It’s about trusting one’s own agency of competence, of critical thinking and so on. In a sense
not happen. Therefore, we’re trying to make this happen. Getting government public servants to trust
can see them across that screen. In Taiwan, we say meeting face to face build 30 percent of trust
If people trust back, they become our best partners. If they don’t
People in Taiwan think that they can trust the government and I wonder how people have nurtured
It’s the same because we trust not the OS or anything, really. We trust a combination of MDM
is authoritative confidence, and 誠信, a authentic confidence. It’s both trust or confidence level, but one
to take part in the governance. Instead of trusting the government to make good use of public resources
of trust is a long-term trust. It takes a lot of trust in one another to handle, specify ideas-based datas to the Taiwan Water Corporation.
Also, the Taiwan Water Corporation have to trust across the sectors for the people versed
and checked into the blockchain so people can trust the government to not alter their numbers. That builds
for the public service, including politicians, to trust people. It is not about people trusting the politics
They understand that the trust in governmental institutions that year was below 10%. So, like
When the public service trusts people this way, through transparency and participation, maybe
Which is why I always said that our core value is for the government to trust the people
One reason I think is that these new technologies contribute to a decline in trust and a rise
The second one is multi-directional. The government trust the citizens first, and some citizens
