Now, that is a very bold move by a democratic country, basically trusting the citizen
should actually retain people’s trust on their local hospitals, and so we really should build a larger hospital, after exploring all the different options.
of a sense that the world is too complex, I’m not going to understand it, and I don’t trust people who
這會有一個問題是，沒有人相信什麼東西是真的，很多人說media trust會降低，都會說所有的東西是動新聞。
is by itself useful, that distributed ledger, by itself, creates trust making new governance possible
stack that are all from liberal democracies that can trust each other’s cybersecurity lab for tested components, and things like that.
in a propaganda, people don’t trust us, and they shouldn’t.
me know and call 1922.” That humble position basically increased the trust of the lessons
we’ve seen this in the past in Taiwan’s relationship with tech. The civic trust between, once again
experience, you know Internet can be a tool to fuel trust in society. It can also be a tool to fuel mistrust in society.
to it a online ordering component, but the core principle is the same. It is trusting citizens
is that instead of us not trusting the people to wash their hands properly, and therefore advise
store it on the local server. It’s just like a antivirus application. If you don’t trust it, you can
that binary, linear thinking. We see it more like two axes. On one axis is the state’s capability to trust
immediately, and I would explain to the cabinet members that if people already trust the citizen
, but just like driving the nightlife underground, people will cease to trust each other.
. This is one example out of many, but I think this trust between the social sectors and also from
It’s a very strong sense of protection. People do trust that, when
collection and therefore reducing the risk and saving time improving mutual trust.
to authenticate. Thank you for that. On zero civic trust, at the moment, what does that mean for you?
