citizens and our democratic network partners to trust Taiwanese code not because it’s from Taiwan but rather because they can independently verify.
difficult question. And then how do we trust that once we’re interoperating that our privacy promises
will be a bot. Everything else will be relegated to a bot. It’s a kind of different expectation, a zero-trust
but also worldwide, to move toward zero-trust architecture, move people off passwords, offer stronger
Yes. Basically when all the trusted, not just officials, but also private sector players and so
Borders is initiating this project, co-trusted journalist initiative. Basically, a white list
It took two years for me to be generally trusted by the senior career public service. And after
You mean in addition to replying emails to administrates? To the first question, the zero-trust
are adopting, the so-called zero trust architecture, meaning that instead of relying just
concerning themselves and we should trust children to join also in public participation before
Exactly, exactly. Yeah, so, for example, the zero-trust FidO implementation, of course
integration, just sabotage the whole zero trust architecture idea because the root, the active directory was hacked.
of those supply chain anyway. The focus should be on zero trust, meaning that the no lateral movement
-identified data, anonymous data, etc., then that actually decimates the trust of the society.
Because the government trusted the citizen enough to not just have a free speech platform
have to trust what she writes, of course, buy anybody with a phone, or a headphone can check
to go through the media or public representatives to have direct exchanges with government officials, and it deepened the public’s trust in those officials.
What I mean is that we start small, like 5,000‑people level, and gradually build that trust
to trust their explanation to it. We have to do a lot of validations and so on.
, to increase trust, not only NDC and not the extended units, in general. What they will obviously do
