trust your telecom, then your telecom keeps those random numbers, but they don’t know how those random members map to the venue.
We just spoke about zero trust. That’s just one subset of the types of attacks that you’re
Again, they fast track this mutual trust-winning processes. I think owning up to those mistakes
Yeah, how we approach the Zero Trust authentication, safeguarding the endpoints, and so
trust markers, and other sorts of identification work, we’d be keen to maintain the conversation
of mutual trust, then we only do top down enablements to the existing top down authorities when
already tested initially in Hsinchu under TTC, the Telecom Tech Center, which we want to rename to Trust Tech Center.
cybersecurity, like the zero trust network architecture around international standards such as SEMI
Yeah. They can never trust that you’re actually talking, because you’re always able to simulate
all these upgrades across your information system, your cyber security, your trust security, your polarization security.
administration, right? So, back in 2014, the trust in the administration was below 10%. So
no mandarin at all, just simply by copying a voice and communication style of someone you trust.
And I trust that they already gave you the contact window. So, I think the INGO window from
saying, “Oh, these air qualities are low quality, low cost, therefore not to be trusted.” However
posture as the CMMC requirement of zero trust architecture. So, we’re converging to zero trust
is hardening our cybersecurity with this idea called Zero Trust, because we predict that AI will lead
that’s not nation to nation but rather trust system to trust system.
, because I’m really fascinated by this phenomena of swift trust. Why people trust each other so easily
the existing power structures all stand to lose something if people stop trusting anyone talking over
something with us because they do trust strangers. The key of doing open source is that you trust random
