Projects like that are traditionally, we don’t see them in other Asian countries, because they threaten the legitimacy of government. When government, the Environmental Protection Agency publish number, but the citizen also publish number, people who participated are going to trust their own numbers, no matter the position of the measurement.
What I’m trying to get at is that, it’s not just one-time transparency. A repeated, transparent communication between multiple parties builds a accountability trail, where people can ask, how did we end up here? I think that’s our main contribution, making all the parties trust each other more.
First of all, the virality of a message is just like a chain mail. Every time it spreads, the one that was mutated to be more trustworthy seeming [laughs] gets more people sharing it. The one that doesn’t really hit something in people’s mind, they don’t get to spread.
We’re way beyond where people think the vote would be rigged or it would be corrupt. The main sentiment is that the current laws are maybe too stringent, [laughs] that it stifles innovation because of the anti-corruption laws. But people are generally pretty trusting the public service being not corrupt.
It’s not as though you mentioned Estonia and China, because there are ways of generating this trust in our world, and it’s completely different. Estonia does it by publishing a transparent trail to every single individual, how their data is being used so they can audit any time they want.
I think it was very aptly characterized as a so‑called disempowerment of citizens. On the one hand, Reddit and social media in general let everyone know that they’re not alone in caring about something, so they formed solidarity very quickly, by swiftly trusting each other. That’s in common time.
By trusting people I mean the things like the radical transparency that I’m practicing here, every meetings that I convene, every decision that I make, are published down to transcript level. Everybody who participate in the part of the process get to tell me what they think about my daily work.
…Again those people share something with us because they do trust strangers. The key of doing open source is that you trust random people on the internet to help you digitize maps and things like that. This is what Civic media is especially good at and which the traditional social activists are especially bad at. This is very interesting because these three groups of people each like something that the other two other groups of people could provide. Just by organizing things in a way that lets people learn from each other eventually helped converge into…
I look forward in the next 14 days after the transcript is produced to add links and everything, blogs, announcements, so that the reader of this transcript can also collectively benefits from the cutting edge research and the commitment from the industry to a safer and more trustworthy AI and information integrity environment.
We think that the ecosystem of copyright-cleaned sources of input, trustworthy sources of input, sources of input that don’t contain data contamination and things like that are going to be more and more important. Llama or Mistral is a good stepping stone towards getting there. I hope that answers the question.
So, these, like Class A agencies that hold the private information for all 23 million people, is going to switch to the security and communication, the T-Road and the Zero Trust architecture, and so on, by the end of next year also. So, the timelines are the same for all three components.
Which is why we must work closely with all three of them. We now share the same architecture, which we call Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA). Meaning that, for example, when I sign my official documents on my device, I may be anywhere. I was quarantined at home for seven days and worked nonstop.
Thank you very much. Yes, in the responses you’ve given just now, that people and contact tracing system within that framework. People trust the system with their own information and information will not be conveyed any further beyond a necessary boundary. It is not used for police or other purposes I understand.
The collective intelligence needs to be trusted and augmented. They explicitly cited our model as an example. I do think our message is resonating not necessarily just in young people, but young people who have had some success maybe locally, maybe they solved a natural disaster, a typhoon, or earthquake, or something together.
It’s not a government idea. It’s invented by the very people who care about human right, and privacy, and data sovereignty. It’s invented by the social sector. Of course, it has more trust . People understood it’s not in it for profit. It’s in it just for the purpose.
I was also part of the discussion, so I just took his idea to the head of cabinet to our premier, saying that we need to trust these people with real time open data or open API because they already have far more reach than anything that our government run websites would do.
It is, but in America, I’m not sure who’s meant to heal the crisis. In Europe, we have a tradition of public service media. There is an idea about who could do this. In America, they trust innovation and a tradition of civil society which I think is quite drained now.
Only the authorized doctors, nurses, and so on can write to that card. All the readers, again, must be pre-registered and approved by the National Health Insurance Agency. That’s why we trust it that much, because we know it will not be harvested to do precision advertisement, or anything like that.
Right, but I think the foundation of what we’re building is trust . We need to be transparent what we log, if we log it, and we need to be clear what we don’t, or what we’re not interested in. IP addresses, for sure, is not something we’re interested in.
You will see that the stock numbers in their pharmacy grow very slowly downward, while everybody who show up thinking that there are still some masks available, run into a situation where in very large font, it says on the front door, “Don’t trust the app.” [laughs] It was a tremendous failure.
