is why I put it in the middle. Acting towards the goals relies on reliable data so as to build trust
as their own enterprise spirit. Then people would trust that. The UK has a example of that, actually
Also, the trust that the government places on the civil society
, that will be a violation of trust. I’m not sure just copying these three readable information here once is such a big deal.
, they create intelligent solution and trust. This is true at local, national level, but it can also
is that we really trusted the citizens. Not only just about the civic technologies, which you probably
I think digital technology really helps this trust, because
actually trust them enough to actually leave their contact details. You can do a SMS or LINE to check
This is not about blindly trusting the NHIA’s numbers. This is about
cannot be trusted with our data. There’s going to be a central database.
with people’s trust with technology as it pertains to contact tracing and digital fence.
implications, the service security implications will be much less trusted because it’s new technology
In this case, we also trusted the nightlife businesses, and we said
, while countering the coronavirus. You can deepen the democracy and social sector’s trust and enlist
as a unified body that everyone seems to trust and represents everyone. I can just imagine in America
for this purpose, you has to develop that trusting relationship between a machine and a human. In order to do that, you have to have explainability.
think it is really a societal mobilization. It is hinging the idea of the government trusting the citizens.
and foremost this trust from the government to its citizens. We do not, for example, institute a very top down
doesn’t spread, because everybody can trust their camp’s YouTubers. That’s still a cost worth paying. Look at the US, what would happen without that?
shred that that paper after four weeks of no local outbreak, then people actually trust them enough
