The citizens who trust the government without the government trusting back is essentially falling into ideological trap. Only by demonstrating that the government trusts citizens more, then the citizens can rationally trust somewhat back into the government. This also applies to surveillance capitalism, by the way.
Then, we trust the children to use the tablet well. Because we trust the children, the children may trust us back. That’s the fundamental idea of a, as I mentioned, inclusive playground.
And so this is, again, just an anecdote but I hope this showed that radically trusting the citizens is very important because if you don’t give trust then you get no trust .
我們以前的法律很在乎這種雙邊互惠，那但是現在其實特別是像這些分散式的 trust system 當道的時代，你去看歐盟的 wallet 或 eIDAS 2.0，也就是大家共用一個分散式帳本，像這樣子的話，你看像烏克蘭不是歐盟的成員，但是他可以參與同一個 trust system 他的簽章歐盟就認，所以這個情況下，我們也可以跟歐盟在一個比較對等的位置上。
They don’t trust me anymore.
The keyword is trustworthy .
簡單講就是 trust our citizens，就是無論如何一定要信任公民。這就是最重要的價值。
I guess that increases trust .
Yes, because we trust the people. To give no trust is to get no trust . To trust people with the information that we have actually fosters a social object, like foreign topics so that people can have a real conversation around it like today’s weather or something.
Trust the citizens more. Make sure that the social innovations are recognized and amplified. Eventually, the citizens will trust back. Even if you trust the citizens and they don’t trust back, chances are that they will have some really good ideas. Listen to those ideas and adapt quickly.
I see. Thank you. We’ve seen so much the government asking people trust and people to trust the government.
當然。老子有句話，它叫「信不足焉，有不信焉」，就是 to give no trust is to get no trust ，所以如果你不信任人民的話，人民當然也不會信任你，如果你覺得說這個人民不會做出什麼有意義的貢獻，到最後他們也不會來做什麼有意義的貢獻。如果你相信大家的話，總是會有一些人會願意也相信回來。
You don’t have trust . You don’t have to trust the report interface. You can run your own analysis…
This is one of the few ways that we’ve been improving the trust from the government to the citizens, trusting the citizens more instead of demanding trust from the citizens as in authoritarian societies.
Digital trust is actually quite low, because the trust in the system is not that high. It’s not the lowest, because even though they don’t trust the system, but because their mobile app experience and their digital experience is very good, it actually bring up their digital trust .
We can say the government trusts the people or starting to trust people, but it doesn’t mean that the people trust back immediately. They don’t have any reason to. We had 30 years of martial law. [laughs] There’s no reason why they’d suddenly trust the government.
Trust in the people by the government is the first step. If the government does not trust its people but demands trust from its people, that’s fascism. That’s not Taiwan. So the question is why doesn’t the government trust its people? I think there are two important factors.
那我們都有這些部分之後，我們在各國就更有一個話語權，就是大家可以知道說我們這邊所製造出來的零組件或者是整體的 AI 系統是尊重這些價值的，所以就不是說這台車它開一開自爆，開一開變成什麼炸彈之類的，而是說你要上車之前，你對於這台車你至少要先打勾這些項目。所以我覺得 Trusted Tech 就是值得信賴的科技，這個是臺灣很具體可以幫忙的的一個部分。那也就是為什麼「 Trusted Tech Standard」是由我來當 Chair，而不是說其他的人來當 Chair。
Explain vTaiwan works with government and in a way, the process gets people to trust government and government to trust people.
我想最大的優勢，就是大家想到臺灣，就想到是 值得信賴 ( Trustworthy ) 。
