For the government to trust people more and to listen to people’s ideas and feelings, and have
stuff. I think the amount of transparency you want to bring into the process, that, in the end, enables trust.
Exactly. Their behavior automatically will change. The point of this whole digital trust
It takes radical trust, because it was before Wikipedia was very popular. Now that Wikipedia
How can that be taken into part in what we just saw here? How can you help building trust
between the thing you’re saying is essentially American and trust. I’m just curious if Audrey would speak to the anarchic...
in terms of communication”? What do you think caused the issue of trust right now?
That was all before I become the digital minister. There’s a certain level of trust of my
of interaction as melodies, but the poetic part of it is where the radical trust and transparency really comes
gone in with a live streaming camera, I would get nowhere. They’re educators, so they understand the value of trust building.
And personal data selling. We have real issue of trust. Those startups who works, who can develop the activity, people start to distrust them.
to be a level of trust that you’ve been able to achieve. It could be very easy for people who dislike the process to start to doubt the neutrality.
put on the balcony, of course I’m going to trust my neighbors even though they have technically less precise equipment.
Even across the screen, I think it enables maybe 20 percent [laughs] of trust. Once people get
I’m sure if they can use the app to call e-taxi, they can also trust a virtual meter
I come back to the trust issue and whether there’s criticism that this is not 1984
of psychological projections. It actually decimates trust.
be the primary metric because that shows how much willingness they have to trust the citizens this way.
we show the state’s working transparently to the citizens so the citizens can trust each other more
increase the public health and increase the mutual trust, then many of those semi-democratic
