Yeah, as I mentioned, the three things on my plate are communication resilience, zero trust and journalism. But maybe John has other suggestions.
So, that is one very concrete thing, is to adopt this zero-trust network architecture. There are many more, but I would just highlight this one.
Our power analysis of this challenge, is then to find people who the Association would trust
the way words mean so that people don’t trust in democracy anymore. That’s the endgame. They care
What we are seeing is that people trust each other much more when we do
. It’s about a institution built upon one’s self trust or autonomy to act competence, not literacy
The second thing I have learned is that to give no trust is to get no trust. That is to say
, we have good mathematical reasons to trust its privacy enhancing properties. But because
participation, the only institution across the OECD baseline that they have less trust
technical interoperable trust system so it could be an ISO or NIST mandated trust system, it could
This process needs to be trusted by people. Otherwise, we have another voting machine crisis. Technology is part of democratic process.
I trust that the knowledge and technologies that’s shared in the commons on the Internet
Yeah, then I could actually do it. Then, I know…Some people don’t trust
The point is that they have to continuously earn the trust. Once you have that healthy
, you have swift trust, but there, that’s just ended.
everybody’s trust in each other. Instead of a daily publication, there’s a real-time publication.
How do you do this? How can you make people trust you with this, so
to the social sector? Or is there more of coexistence with those or trust in those models?
they already trust. There is no way to abuse it for advertisement or commercial purposes.
and media before this mutual trust can meaningfully happen.
