it’s at least 1080p, and sometimes 2K or 4K now, then people actually builds trust. It’s increasing
the producer of the data. The value of data is built on the value of trust. Without the value
to foster that can promote trust in the public sector so that we can trust citizens more. Just one very quick example.
end up building out some kind of trusted presence, some kind of trusted brand, then we’re hoping to have the good problem solve.
their trust, and they earn their trust by responding to each and every question that you just refer to in the daily press conference.
How should we trust what they are saying now? You didn’t have that problem because even before
, right? Norms, in essence, are stronger. To spell out the norms requires the government to trust
One side of the coin is government trusting citizens. The other side is citizens trusting
Even if we trust the people fully, there’s always people who don’t trust the government yet
trusting the people and the people trusting the government, because another area that you’re clearly
Also, branching in on PayPal actually underlines a lot of inquisitive trust in the flow
I would like the public service to trust people more. I think that’s my main mandate going
have of these things, the more comfortable they are. Maybe they don’t really trust the institution
Yes, as the public service, we move at the speed of trust. If the government doesn’t trust
I think that’s the piece that’s difficult, is the trust and working
. Everything else is detail. The first one is that the government need to trust people and not expect
trusted registry of people who can vote to guard against vote stuffing. Both, I think, is not primarily
Our basic philosophy is that the government need to radically trust
The trust must first be gained with the social sector who trust each
to make a fully-informed decision themselves. If this is a message in the form of trust as we’ve got
