Well, I mean, if you have off-ramps, of course, people are going to drive on off-ramps if they don't feel that this destination is where they're going. If you don't have off-ramps, I guess, yes, you do accelerate, but then it leads you somewhere you don't want to go, right? And I think that is the main idea. I am an accelerator fellow, a senior accelerator fellow at the Ethics and AI Institute in Oxford. So our program is about accelerating choice. It's not about stopping innovation. It's about innovating toward where the society wants. And that is probably what the innovators truly want anyway. It was just because of the high PPM, because of the slow feedback loop, because of the megaphone broadcasting only model, the innovators really had no idea what a society really wants. There's no way for them to be truly attentive to the society. So if we figure that part out, I think most innovators would prefer if their innovations are taken by the society as something that a society can actually use rather than something that society gets strapped on and just, you know, keep spinning the hamster wheel just because they cannot get off.