Yes. And also, I don't think either side is necessarily wrong. I mean, last March, when we had that deliberative conversation, people did vote, and it's 447 people, statistically representative of the Taiwanese population. So their core package where more 85% of people supported and the remaining 15% kind of can live with it also, got still passed to the parliament. So we did not skip the MP. The MPs did deliberate on the core packages and the law was passed in May and July. There's two laws respectively. And then this year in Taiwanese social media, there's just no deep fake ads anymore. So I think the MPs need to see that this way of polling, polling by groups, generative polling, is actually very effective in defining what people want, as well as discovering people's experiences. But the actual work in coding the laws, in developing the laws and delivering the policy, that is still the job of the MPs. We're not skipping past that. So both sides can have something that goes with it.