Wait, I didn’t understand the last part. If they don’t see the…

Yeah, so it’s both what we integrated, the harms that we integrated, the bug bounties that we’re acting upon, and also the forecast of the things that we’re seeing.

Right, so I remember from our conversation, you were saying like, basically you’re creating… cause you have this number that people can report things to, and then you have the daily broadcast. So, it’s in our language, it’s like, she’s creating this little like Truman Show in which there’s a ...

Got it. Interesting. So, but what happens when the harm is more structural? So, it’s not like I found this specific jailbreak method and there’s gonna be literally an infinite set of…

Got it. And then of course, the question becomes what constitutes being a player that is racing to safety? Because can we define, like the letter of the law of safety will lag the spirit of safety as it needs to be defined?

What was the third one again? People don’t want governance; they want special regulations…?

Yeah, well, it seemed like the beliefs that you were looking for consensus around in March were slightly different than these ones, but not that it has to be, because it’s obviously generalized.

So anyway, you get the idea that behind this, we thought that a lot of these sub statements… these are the cruxes of beliefs that people have that enable them to believe in different endgame scenarios. And what we’re trying to do right now is just interviewing… In fact, we’re ...

You could realize that there’s actually a lot of consensuses, like eventually it’ll be very cheap to build very powerful AI. There can be a lot of people on many sides of the fence who agree with that statement. Butlerian Jihad against AI where we just sort of declare like ...

So, we got this graph from some people who work at a couple of the companies and one option now on the left if you scroll over to all the cruxes and assumptions about this… If you zoom in there’s like all these beliefs that I wanted to explore with ...