Yeah, they dress it up, literally.
This is on medium, and it is also on YouTube. Then this is the robot. I was having a chat with...
Yeah, it’s on YouTube. It’s called “virtual reality for civic deliberation,” where I talk about...
That’s right. This is what this robot looks like.
Re-presenting me.
They call it Galatea, which is a very romantic name, the sculpture that actually can come alive. So, it was pretty good. I don’t have a photo here. I’m sure I have a photo somewhere.
It’s a physical robot.
I sent my robotic double to Madrid a week before.
Maybe my robotic double will do.
It was very good. It was the kind of city I’ve seen in the occupy literatures. Now it’s post-occupy, but anyway. It’s one of the major cities in Europe for civic engagement.
Madrid, London, Paris.
Yeah, I was in Europe.
So we’re already doing this, but we should do it more, especially on the proposal itself, not just the transcripts.
Previously during, for example, the Uber discussion, we did have everybody’s faces next to the words they said.
Engage more.
That’s great.
Thank you.
The minister’s name, why not? Yeah, “the minister wants to have a chat with you.” It sounds good.
It just shows the ministry. That’s right.
Right, so we can get Professor 朱德芳’s photo from her intro on the Company Act rewrite.
Yeah, better than puppies.
It’s a very good point. If we get all the ministers record or at least take a photo for their face online, I’m sure they will increase people’s willingness to participate. Sure, why not? It’s a good idea.
Which ministry? Why not?
Basically it’s like most crowdfunding websites, and this says, by the time, 30 days later in Taiwan, this ministry will have a live-streamed deliberation with crowdsourced agenda and participants.
Right.
Right. Basically each of them represents a topic under discussion.
It’s true.
But it needs better photos. I get this much.
That’s the PDIS website.
We actually do. We have a professional photographer upstairs, but then we’re not putting him to much use.
OK, then you understood all of this. That’s all of it.
[speaking Mandarin] OK, we’re asking to airplay it.
Yeah, you can airplay it.
We do have a mock‑up.
I’m pretty sure the new design is coded out. It’s just not populated.
That sounds good.
Yeah, so put a countdown that when it runs through the right, we have a TV show.
It is open source.
Policy...
That’s part of the new design, also.
It’s part of the design, also.
It’s the page where it came. Oh, you mean the front page like here? We need to have a countdown right here alongside every slide?
It’s not at the bottom.
It says there’s 22 days left and there’s going to be a face‑to‑face deliberation when this runs all the way to the right.
A countdown?
Yes and that’s part of her design. It makes it clear, abundantly, the front page, that this is going to TV and whatever...
Yeah, should go the front page.
That’s the reason.
Part of the thing that’s highlighted, seen in this design, is that any comments that’s constructive here will be part of the agenda and the face‑to‑face deliberation that this live‑streamed 30 days every month. This is basically crowdsourcing the agenda of the face‑to‑face deliberation.
Yeah, you can click it, and then you can see what’s the existing people’s thoughts on it. Like Jalin says that. RonKuo says that. If it needs some explanatory or expository material, then within seven days the ministry in charge of this has to come here and replay to you ...
